<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="pyblosxom/1.2.1 06/01/2005" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
<channel>
<title>ddaa bbloggs   </title>
<link>http://ddaa.net/blog/work-at-canonical</link>
<description>Some free bits of software.</description>
<language>en</language>
<item>
    <title>What it&apos;s like to work at Canonical</title>
    <link>http://ddaa.net/blog/work-at-canonical.html</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Graham recently wrote &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/opensource.html&quot;&gt;an essay&lt;/a&gt; titled &lt;em&gt;What Business Can Learn from
Open Source&lt;/em&gt;. One of things he talks about is how traditional &amp;quot;professionalism&amp;quot;
is actually quite harmful, and advocates decentralised work. As an employee of
&lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.canonical.com&quot;&gt;Canonical&lt;/a&gt;, the company that created &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com&quot;&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; and is developing &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://launchpad.net/&quot;&gt;Launchpad&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://bazaar.canonical.com/&quot;&gt;Bazaar&lt;/a&gt;, I almost felt like this essay was talking about me. Working at
Canonical is quite a lot like what Paul Graham describes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The company has little in the way of actual office space. The development is
done by people scattered over four continents, most of them working at home.
Developers are recruited in the &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html&quot;&gt;libre software&lt;/a&gt; community based on their
current and past activities, the basic hiring philosophy of the company is to
get people to work on what they would do for free. Of course, a paycheck always
comes with some associated tedium, and sometimes one has to work on totally
boring things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Canonical is an interesting company to work for, if only because the way work
actually gets done is quite similar to the way a community project would work.
The main communication tools are (in no specific order) e-mail, IRC chat,
wikis, and a decentralised version control system. Some people in the company
like to say that we work &amp;quot;pants free&amp;quot;. After all, when your office is next door
to your bedroom, there is little use for suits and ties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even though &amp;quot;on the internet, &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html&quot;&gt;nobody knows you are a dog&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; I can confidently
assert that all the Canonical staff at least looks and sounds &lt;em&gt;somewhat&lt;/em&gt; human.
The whole company congregates at least three times a year, for the Ubuntu
developers summit, and specific development groups attend additional &amp;quot;sprints&amp;quot;
as needed. Every time, the interesting question is &amp;quot;where?&amp;quot;. The whole-company
meetings I have attended were held in Oxford, Mataró and Sydney and I have
attended sprints in London (at Mark&apos;s flat) and Brazil (at &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://async.com.br/&quot;&gt;Async&lt;/a&gt; offices),
while others had sprints in Cape Town, Montreal, and probably a few other
places.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another fun thing in working for Canonical, is that it tends to elicit &amp;quot;Wow!&amp;quot;
reactions from some people, but the real nice thing is the people you get to
work with. That is really an elite company, with a lot of very bright hackers
and quite a few with excellent communication skills. Most people there also
tend to have quite interesting personalities or backgrounds. And also, we get
to go to night clubs with Mark Shuttleworth at the end of Ubuntu summits, and
sometimes we fly on his plane on our way to one conference or another.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
	    <item>
      <title>What it&apos;s like to work at Canonical</title>
      <link>http://ddaa.net/blog/work-at-canonical/work-at-canonical</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Paul Graham recently wrote &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/opensource.html&quot;&gt;an essay&lt;/a&gt; titled &lt;em&gt;What Business Can Learn from
Open Source&lt;/em&gt;. One of things he talks about is how traditional &amp;quot;professionalism&amp;quot;
is actually quite harmful, and advocates decentralised work. As an employee of
&lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.canonical.com&quot;&gt;Canonical&lt;/a&gt;, the company that created &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com&quot;&gt;Ubuntu&lt;/a&gt; and is developing &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://launchpad.net/&quot;&gt;Launchpad&lt;/a&gt; and
&lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://bazaar.canonical.com/&quot;&gt;Bazaar&lt;/a&gt;, I almost felt like this essay was talking about me. Working at
Canonical is quite a lot like what Paul Graham describes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The company has little in the way of actual office space. The development is
done by people scattered over four continents, most of them working at home.
Developers are recruited in the &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html&quot;&gt;libre software&lt;/a&gt; community based on their
current and past activities, the basic hiring philosophy of the company is to
get people to work on what they would do for free. Of course, a paycheck always
comes with some associated tedium, and sometimes one has to work on totally
boring things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Canonical is an interesting company to work for, if only because the way work
actually gets done is quite similar to the way a community project would work.
The main communication tools are (in no specific order) e-mail, IRC chat,
wikis, and a decentralised version control system. Some people in the company
like to say that we work &amp;quot;pants free&amp;quot;. After all, when your office is next door
to your bedroom, there is little use for suits and ties.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even though &amp;quot;on the internet, &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://www.unc.edu/depts/jomc/academics/dri/idog.html&quot;&gt;nobody knows you are a dog&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; I can confidently
assert that all the Canonical staff at least looks and sounds &lt;em&gt;somewhat&lt;/em&gt; human.
The whole company congregates at least three times a year, for the Ubuntu
developers summit, and specific development groups attend additional &amp;quot;sprints&amp;quot;
as needed. Every time, the interesting question is &amp;quot;where?&amp;quot;. The whole-company
meetings I have attended were held in Oxford, Mataró and Sydney and I have
attended sprints in London (at Mark&apos;s flat) and Brazil (at &lt;a class=&quot;reference&quot; href=&quot;http://async.com.br/&quot;&gt;Async&lt;/a&gt; offices),
while others had sprints in Cape Town, Montreal, and probably a few other
places.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another fun thing in working for Canonical, is that it tends to elicit &amp;quot;Wow!&amp;quot;
reactions from some people, but the real nice thing is the people you get to
work with. That is really an elite company, with a lot of very bright hackers
and quite a few with excellent communication skills. Most people there also
tend to have quite interesting personalities or backgrounds. And also, we get
to go to night clubs with Mark Shuttleworth at the end of Ubuntu summits, and
sometimes we fly on his plane on our way to one conference or another.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category domain="http://www.sauria.com"></category>
      <dc:date>2005-08-13T20:21:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>